The argument from junk DNA suggests that a designer would be maximally efficient in his use of information.  There appears to be some information that does not execute or have any meaningful coding.  Darwinism takes this issue and uses it as the result of the prediction that there would be left over information not being used due to natural selection and random mutation.  However, it doesn’t appear that all junk DNA is actually junk.

The classical model of the genome was developed to support the Darwinian New Synthesis and was based on these assumptions:

• Genetic determinants are discrete physical units
• Only the collection of genes (genotype) is real; organismal development and traits (the phenotype) are epiphenomenal
• The structure of gene can be explained solely in terms of population genetics (mutation and selection/genetic drift)

The presuppositions of the model

• Genomes are the only carriers of phenotypic determinants; no laws of form exist à phenotypes mirror genotypes
• Genomes are aggregates of simple entities that are constantly changing entails that phenotypes are always transforming
• Genomes can be recombined and mutated in an unlimited way à morphological evolution is “open-minded”
• Any two sets of genomes are connected by a finite number of mutations à morphological gaps are illusory
  read more »